Christmas Sermon 2022: Matthew 13.44-46

 * I was able to preach on Christmas Day!  Here is the video of my sermon from Matthew 13.44-46.

The Genealogy of Jesus: A Few Comments and Resources

* Notes from a bulletin insert I did when preaching on the genealogy of Jesus in Matthew 1.1-17.

So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; from David to the deportation to Babylon, fourteen generations; and from the deportation to Babylon to the Messiah, fourteen generations.

--Matthew 1.17

Abraham	David	Jeconiah
Isaac	Solomon	Shealtiel
Jacob	Rehoboam	Zerubbabel
Judah	Abijah	Abihud
Perez	Asa	Eliakim
Hezron	Jehoshaphat	Azor
Ram	Joram	Zadok
Amminidab	Uzziah	Achim
Nahshon	Jotham	Eliud
Salmon	Ahaz	Eleazar
Boaz	Hezekiah	Matthan
Obed	Manasseh	Jacob
Jesse	Amon	Joseph
David	Josiah	Jesus

NOTES:

·      Matthew is presenting a stylized genealogy.  Not everyone in the line is mentioned.

·      “David” is counted twice because he is shown special prominence in genealogy.

o   Mentioned in 1.1.

o   Verse 6—“David the king.”

o   Mentioned 2x’s in v. 17.

o   The numerical value of David’s name in Hebrew equals 14.

o   One of Matthew’s favorite titles for the Messiah is “the Son of David” (1.1; 9.27; 12.23; 15.22; 20.30-31; 21.9, 15; 22.42-45)

___________________________________________

Proposed Solutions to Alleged Contradictions in Genealogies

1.     Matthew gives Joseph’s line of descent and Luke gives Mary’s line of descent. 

a.     First proposed by Annius of Viterbo (c. AD 1490)

b.     Martin Luther

c.      R. Larry Overstreet (GTJ, 1981)

2.     Matthew gives Mary’s line of descent and Luke gives Joseph’s line of descent.

a.     Tertullian

3.     Matthew gives Joseph’s natural descent through actual father (Jacob) and Luke gives Joseph’s legal descent through Heli after a levirate marriage.

a.     Julius Africanus (d. AD 240)

4.     Matthew gives legal line and Luke gives Joseph’s actual, physical descendants.

a.     Lord A. Hervey

b.     J. Gresham Machen

5.     Matthew gives line through Joseph’s mother (maternal grandfather = Jacob) and Luke gives line through Joseph’s father.

a.     R. P. Nettelhorst (JETS, 1988)

For Further Research:

Glenn Miller’s page: http://christianthinktank.com/fabprof4.html

R. P. Nettelhorst, “The Genealogy of Jesus” JETS 31 (1988). 

            Available online: http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-            PDFs/31/31-2/31-2-pp169-172_JETS.pdf

R. Larry Overstreet, “Difficulties of New Testament Genealogies”

(GTJ, 1981).  Available online:

http://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/gtj/02-2_303.pdf

Christmas Apologetic Resources

Jason Engwer over at Triablogue has linked to a great deal of resources dealing with apologetic issues surrounding the Christmas Story.  Issues that are covered include such items as the star the Maji followed to the historicity of the birth narratives in Matthew and Luke.

Christmas Resources 2015

Mary: An Evangelical Appreciation

I am impressed by Mary.  This was not always the case.  Up until about two years ago I thought of Mary as passive, sort of weak, and a little insipid.  She was a place holder in the story who was trotted out every December but she wasn’t someone I looked to in admiration.  Reading Scot McKnight’s The Real Mary: Why Evangelical Christians Can Embrace the Mother of Jesus (Brewster: Paraclete Press, 2007) was an eye-opener.  When Mary responds to the angelic message with, “May it be done to me according to your word” I had always heard these words as passive resignation.  What I failed to see was her courageous stance to accept all the consequences associated with the path before her.  She would be slandered and her son would be cursed as a mamzer.  This courageous faith that actively takes up the mantle of suffering was challenging and alluring.  I found myself wanting to be like this teenage girl who so faithfully responded to God. 

I also find Mary’s scripturally soaked Magnificat to be exciting and challenging.  To consider that these words were spoken by a pious Jewish teenager is sobering.  This is to take nothing away from the inspiration of the Holy Spirit but it is to recognize the human author.  Mary is steeped in the Scriptures and she has a confident, God-centered defiance against all that is opposed to God’s kingdom—he has brought down rulers from their thrones (Luke 2.52).  McKnight captured my imagination with these words about Mary:

“It may seem counter-intuitive to say so, and I mean this all respect: Mary was not a ‘nice’ girl.  If ‘nice’ means meek and mild and mind-your-own-business, then Mary was not nice.  In fact, Mary scared ‘nice’ passive girls because she was dangerously active.  Instead of minding her own business, Mary was minding Herod’s and, as we will see, Caesar Augustus’s.  And well into Jesus’ own ministry, we will see that Mary minded Jesus’ business, too.”

McKnight goes on to add:

“Mary was a muscular, wiry woman whose eyes were aglow with a dazzling hope for justice and whose body evoked a robust confidence in the God who was about to turn the world upside down through her son.”[1]

           

This kind of courageous faith with a scripturally soaked social-conscience is powerfully moving to me.

---

     [1] Scot McKnight, The Real Mary: Why Evangelical Christians Can Embrace the Mother of Jesus (Brewster: Paraclete Press, 2007), 26, 27.

The Nativity According to Stephen King

You gotta go and see this one...

Michael Bird has the provocative title My Christmas Sermon: The Nativity According to Stephen King.

Good stuff.

Christmas as the Triumph of Christ Over Paganism

I had thought of writing about Christmas and its "pagan" origins but then Michael Bird went and said what I think so well.  He has written December 25 Means the Triumph of Christianity Over Paganism.  Here are Bird's thoughts:

Yes, we’ve all heard the JW, Free Presbyterian, and Puritan arguments that the 25th of December was originally a pagan festival to celebrate the birth of the sun god Sol Invictus, Dies Natalis Solis Invicti, “the birthday of the unconquered sun,” therefore, Christians should not celebrate Christmas because it is a pagan holiday. There might be some truth to this. The 12th century  Syrian bishop Jacob Bar-Salibi wrote: “It was a custom of the Pagans to celebrate on the same 25 December the birthday of the Sun, at which they kindled lights in token of festivity. In these solemnities and revelries the Christians also took part. Accordingly when the doctors of the Church perceived that the Christians had a leaning to this festival, they took counsel and resolved that the true Nativity should be solemnised on that day.” Yet I would point out that historians actually question which came first, the Christian festival of Christmas, or the pagan festival to Invictus, both were celebrated on Dec 25, but who did it first is not clear.  The truth is that the selection of Dec 25 for Christmas could have been taken over from any number of winter solstice festivals.

But let’s grant a Christmas vs. Sol Invictus competition vying for people’s religious attention in the third and fourth centuries of the Roman Empire. What does it mean? Well, you might notice two things. First, some of the third century emperors like Aurelian and Decian who persecuted Christians were devoted to Sol Invictus. Decian wanted to unify the Empire around the worship of Sol Invictus, and thus sought to purify the Empire of Christians. Second, note also the forthright desire of some European intellectuals to return western civilization back to a pagan pluralism  as if paganism will lead to a more open minded and tolerant society (see Alain de Benoist’s On Being a Pagan). Bad news for Decian – his empire is gone and Jesus not Solus Invictus is celebrated on Dec 25. Bad news for neo-pagans like de Benoist, as long as “Hark the Herald Angels” and “O Holy Night” are songs people hear, sing, and enjoy at Christmas, they don’t stand a chance in hell.

Christmas means that the unconquerable god of the Romans just got conquered. A pagan Roman holiday just got stuffed with more Christianity than a December Turkey stuffed with spiced bread crumbs. Dawkins can issue a secular intifada against Christianity all he likes, but we got the best holiday, the best music, and the best message – joy to the world and peace on earth. So Christmas ain’t going away any time soon.

Tertullian wrote: “We [Christians] are but of yesterday, and yet we already fill your cities, islands, camps, your palace, senate, and forum. We have left you only your temples” (Apology 37). To that I would, add: “Oh, FYI, we just stole your holiday and crowned Jesus as King of kings on top of  a city with seven hills, sitting on a big bad ass throne using Jupiter, Sol Victus, and Caesar as a foot rest. Hope that’s okay, if not, too flipping bad.”

Christmas means that Jesus has defeated the powers, the pagan gods that military rulers used to bring their peoples into subjection, to oppress all dissent, and to bring misery upon the masses of men and women.  Christmas means that the tyranny of paganism – its pantheon, politics, and power – have been broken by a Jewish man who died on a Roman cross. Christmas means that the power for peace does not come from a Roman legion, but is heard in the anthem of a legion of angels singing praises to the infant Jesus. Christmas means that the pagan kings who, “To robbery, slaughter, plunder, they give the lying name of empire; they make a solitude and call it peace” have been robbed and plundered of the one thing which gave them power: fear. Christmas means freedom from the worship of the state so that we might enter into the state of worship of the one true God and his Son. Christmas means the greatest social reversal since Cinderella because, as Mary sang,  ”He has brought down the powerful from their thrones, and lifted up the lowly (Luke 1:52 NRSV)” (shh, don’t tel the Tea Party, St. Mary might be launching a class war on the rich!). Christmas means God has entered into the lowliness of the human estate in order to raise humanity up to the ceiling of heaven. Christmas means that what stands between heaven and earth is not a plethora of gods with the sexual ethics of Charlie Sheen and the behavior of an  undisciplined toddler with superpowers, but the man Jesus Christ who came, lived, and died to reconcile humanity to God. Christmas means the victory of God over the inhumanity and irreligion of paganism. So I say, bake that ham, roast that turkey, pour forth the wine, sing and make merry, cause Jesus just kicked the Roman gods and all the evil that they stood for in the testiculus - why not celebrate it!

Merry Christmas!

The "Scientific" Shepherd

A little Christmas humor...