Saturday, October 22, 2016

Quotations on the Meaning of Life

* Select quotations relevant to the issue of the meaning of life.  I used a few of these in my presentation Metaphysics and the Meaning of Life: How the Kingdom of God Changes Everything!


Meaning of Life Quotations

1.     “If we present a man with a concept of man which is not true, we may well corrupt him.  When we present man as an automaton of reflexes, as a mind-machine, as a bundle of instincts, as a pawn of drives and reactions, as a mere product of instinct, heredity and environment, we feed the nihilism to which modern man is, in any case prone.  I became acquainted with the last stage of that corruption in my second concentration camp, Auschwitz.  The gas chambers of Auschwitz were the ultimate consequence of the theory that man is nothing but the product of heredity and environment—or, as the Nazi liked to say, of ‘Blood and Soil.’  I am absolutely convinced that the gas chambers of Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Maidanek were ultimately prepared not in some Ministry or other in Berlin, but rather at the desks and in the lecture halls of nihilistic scientists and philosophers.”[1]   --Viktor Frankl

2.     “That man is the product of causes which had no prevision of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental collocations of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity of thought and feeling, can preserve an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labors of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and that the whole temple of man’s achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins—all these things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand.  Only within the scaffolding of these truths, only on the firm foundation of unyielding despair, can the soul’s habitation henceforth be safely built.”[2]   --Bertrand Russell

3.     “We’re just a bit of pollution.  If you got rid of us, and all the stars and all the galaxies and all the planets and all the aliens and everybody, then the universe would be largely the same.  We’re completely irrelevant.”[3]  --Lawrence Krauss (Arizona State University cosmologist)

4.     “It is almost irresistible for humans to believe that we have some special relation to the universe, that human life is not just a more or less farcical outcome of a chain of accidents reaching back to the first three minutes, but that we were somehow built in from the beginning…. It is very hard to realize that this is all just a tiny part of an overwhelmingly hostile universe.  It is even harder to realize that this present universe has evolved from an unspeakably unfamiliar early condition, and faces a future extinction of endless cold or intolerable heat.  The more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it also seems pointless.”[4]   --Steven Weinberg (Harvard cosmologist)

5.     “We were created not by a supernatural intelligence but by chance and necessity as one species out of millions of species in Earth’s biosphere.  Hope and wish for otherwise as we will, there is no evidence of an external grace shining down upon us, no demonstrable destiny or purpose assigned to us, no second life vouchsafed us for the end of the present one.  We are, it seems, completely alone.  And that in my opinion is a very good thing.  It means we are completely free.”[5]    --E. O. Wilson (Harvard biologist)

6.     “’You,’ your joys and your sorrows, your memories and your ambitions, your sense of personal identity and free will, are in fact no more than the behavior of a vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated molecules.  As Lewis Carroll’s Alice might have phrased it: ‘You’re nothing but a pack of neurons.’”[6]   --Francis Crick

7.     “The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.”[7]   --Richard Dawkins

8.     “Naturalistic evolution has clear consequences that Charles Darwin understood perfectly.  1) No gods worth having exist; 2) no life after death exist; 3) no ultimate foundation for ethics exists; 4) no ultimate meaning in life exists; and 5) human free will is nonexistent.”[8]  --William Provine (Cornell evolutionary biologist)

9.     “The universe doesn’t seem to me to be like the kind of entity that could have a higher purpose.”[9]  --John Maynard Smith (evolutionary biologist)

10. “Living creatures capable of reflecting on their own existence are a freak accident, existing for one brief moment in the history of the universe…. There is no God, no Intelligent Designer, no higher purpose to our lives.”[10]   --Keith Devlin (Stanford mathematician)

11. “As evolutionists, we see that no traditional justification of the kind is possible.  Morality, or more strictly our belief in morality, is merely an adaptation put in place to further our reproductive ends.  Hence the basis of ethics does not lie in God’s will—or in the metaphorical roots of evolution or any other part of the framework of the Universe.  In an important sense, ethics as we understand it is an illusion fobbed off on us by our genes to get us to cooperate.  It is without external grounding.”[11]   --Michael Ruse and E. O. Wilson

12. “The Darwinian argues that morality simply does not work (from a biological perspective), unless we believe that it is objective.  Darwinian theory shows that, in fact, morality is a function of (subjective) feelings; but it shows also that we have (and must have) the illusion of objectivity…. In a sense, therefore, morality is a collective illusion foisted upon us by our genes.”[12]   --Michael Ruse

13. “Darwinism thus puts the capstone on a process which since Newton’s time has driven teleology to the explanatory sidelines. In short it has made Darwinians into metaphysical Nihilists denying that there is any meaning or purpose to the universe, its contents and its cosmic history. But in making Darwinians into metaphysical nihilists, the solvent algorithm should have made them into ethical nihilists too. For intrinsic values and obligations make sense only against the background of purposes, goals, and ends which are not merely instrumental.”[13]  --Tamler Sommers & Alex Rosenberg

14. “Nihilism is not a prescription or proscription of any conduct.  The nihilist may well admit that accepting categorical and hypothetical imperatives may often serve the parochial interests of oneself and others.  To be an ethical nihilist commits one to nothing more than the denial of objective or intrinsic moral values and categorical imperatives.” [14]  --Tamler Sommers and Alex Rosenberg


     [1] Quoted in Richard Weikart, The Death of Humanity and the Case for Life (Washington, D.C.: Regnery Faith, 2016), 11-12.  Weikart is quoting Viktor E. Frankl, The Doctor and the Soul: From Psychotherapy to Logotherapy (New York: Vintage Books, 1986), xxvii.
     [2] Bertrand Russell, “A Free Man’s Worship” (1903) in Why I Am Not a Christian (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1957), 107.
     [3] Quoted in Richard Weikart, The Death of Humanity and the Case for Life (Washington, D.C.: Regnery Faith, 2016), 44.  Lawrence Krauss,
     [4] Quoted in Richard Weikart, The Death of Humanity and the Case for Life (Washington, D.C.: Regnery Faith, 2016), 45.  Weikart is quoting Weinberg’s book The First Three Minutes 1977.
     [5] Quoted in Richard Weikart, The Death of Humanity and the Case for Life (Washington, D.C.: Regnery Faith, 2016), 111.  Weikart is quoting Wilson’s book The Meaning of Human Existence (2014).
     [6] Quoted in Casey Luskin, “Darwin’s Poisoned Tree: Atheistic Advocacy and the Constitutionality of Teaching Evolution in Public Schools” Trinity Law Review 21.1 (Fall, 2015), 162.  Luskin is quoting Crick’s The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul (1988).
     [7] Quoted in Casey Luskin, “Darwin’s Poisoned Tree: Atheistic Advocacy and the Constitutionality of Teaching Evolution in Public Schools” Trinity Law Review 21.1 (Fall, 2015), 164.  Luskin is quoting Dawkins’ River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life (1995).
     [8] Quoted in Casey Luskin, “Darwin’s Poisoned Tree: Atheistic Advocacy and the Constitutionality of Teaching Evolution in Public Schools” Trinity Law Review 21.1 (Fall, 2015), 166.
     [9] Quoted in Casey Luskin, “Darwin’s Poisoned Tree: Atheistic Advocacy and the Constitutionality of Teaching Evolution in Public Schools” Trinity Law Review 21.1 (Fall, 2015), 181.
     [10] Quoted in Casey Luskin, “Darwin’s Poisoned Tree: Atheistic Advocacy and the Constitutionality of Teaching Evolution in Public Schools” Trinity Law Review 21.1 (Fall, 2015), 182.
     [11] Quoted in Casey Luskin, “Darwin’s Poisoned Tree: Atheistic Advocacy and the Constitutionality of Teaching Evolution in Public Schools” Trinity Law Review 21.1 (Fall, 2015), 221.
     [12] Michael Ruse, Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy (Basil Blackwell, 1986), 253. 
     [13] Tamler Sommers and Alex Rosenberg, “Darwin’s Nihilistic Idea: Evolution and the Meaninglessness of Life” Biology and Philosophy 18(5); November, 2003, 653.
     [14] Tamler Sommers and Alex Rosenberg, “Darwin’s Nihilistic Idea: Evolution and the Meaninglessness of Life” Biology and Philosophy 18(5); November, 2003, 667-668.